Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS11
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the FH3 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the FH3 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FH3 was brought out 9 years prior to the GR III which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the FH3 matches up vs the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FH3 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Ricoh GR III
| FH3 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Panasonic FH3
| GR III | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | January 2010 | Newer by 106 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FH3 and Ricoh GR III
| FH3 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic FH3 has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
See the Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FH3 compared to the GR III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH3 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FH3 and GR III.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FH3 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR III will render extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged FH3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Ricoh GR III |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FS11 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165g (0.36 lb) | 257g (0.57 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $160 | $900 |