Clicky

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Panasonic FH3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Panasonic FH3 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. The resolution of the FH3 (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly similar but the FH3 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The FH3 was brought out 19 months prior to the GXR Mount A12 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the FH3 grades versus the GXR Mount A12 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 FH3 GXR Mount A12 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Panasonic FH3

 GXR Mount A12 FH3 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2010Fresher by 19 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FH3 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 FH3 GXR Mount A12 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH3 enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Take a look at the Panasonic FH3 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the FH3 versus the GXR Mount A12.

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FH3 and GXR Mount A12 is 94 and 84 respectively.

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FH3 and GXR Mount A12.

As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FH3 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic FH3 will deliver greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older FH3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Portrait photography highlights
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
55
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (12MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography factors
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
65
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography factors
34
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
continuous shooting slow (6.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
39
max shutter speed is good (1/9,000s)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Panasonic FH3
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
64
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
60
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FH3 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Landscape photography camera
37
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
52
focusing manually
great max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Panasonic FH3
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
29
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
26
great max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FH3 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Brand Name Panasonic Ricoh
Model type Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Also called Lumix DMC-FS11 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2010-01-06 2011-08-05
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Max aperture f/2.8-6.9 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/9000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 6.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.80 m 9.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 165g (0.36 lb) 370g (0.82 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $160 $349