Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH3.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-30 front Ricoh WG-30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-30/Ricoh-WG-30-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FH3 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The FH3 was manufactured 5 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the FH3 matches up versus the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 and Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FH3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Ricoh WG-30
FH3 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Panasonic FH3
WG-30 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 57 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH3 and Ricoh WG-30
FH3 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FH3 provides outer measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the FH3 compared to the WG-30.
![Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH3-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the FH3 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
![Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH3-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FH3 and WG-30.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older FH3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH3-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH3-vs-Ricoh-WG-30-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FS11 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $160 | $428 |