Clicky

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
61
Features
38
Overall
51

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Panasonic FH3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS11
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Panasonic FH3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the FH3 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FH3 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The FH3 was manufactured 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the FH3 matches up against the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FH3 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FH3

 DP2 Quattro FH3 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FH3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FH3 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Panasonic FH3 provides outer dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Panasonic FH3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the FH3 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH3 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH3 and DP2 Quattro.

Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FH3 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged FH3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
28
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
76
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Street Comparison

Street photography with Panasonic FH3
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
60
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FH3 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
47
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FH3 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
64
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
37
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3")
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FH3 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
29
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Panasonic FH3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FH3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Panasonic Sigma
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS11 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-06 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 6.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 6.80 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 165 grams (0.36 lbs) 395 grams (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $160 $931