Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35


91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS18
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Panasonic FH5 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FH5 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The FH5 was launched 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the FH5 grades vs the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FH5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
FH5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic FH5
WG-M1 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 44 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FH5 and Ricoh WG-M1
FH5 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FH5 comes with outside dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Panasonic FH5 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the FH5 compared to the WG-M1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FH5 and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH5 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Panasonic FH5 to render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The older FH5 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FS18 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 photos | 350 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $169 | $2,000 |