Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the FP2 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the FP2 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FP2 was launched 6 months after the GR Digital III which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the FP2 scores versus the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FP2 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| FP2 | GR Digital III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic FP2
| GR Digital III | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| FP2 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | July 2009 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Panasonic FP2 provides exterior measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FP2 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the FP2 vs the GR Digital III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FP2 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FP2 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FP2 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Panasonic FP2 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively.
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic FP2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine IV | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.90 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $80 | $399 |