Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Updated by Ricoh GR II
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's look much closer at the Panasonic FP3 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FP3 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is very close but the FP3 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FP3 was unveiled 4 years before the GR and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the FP3 scores vs the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FP3 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Ricoh GR
FP3 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Panasonic FP3
GR | FP3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | January 2010 | More recent by 39 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP3 and Ricoh GR
FP3 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FP3 has got outer dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Panasonic FP3 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the FP3 compared to the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FP3 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FP3 and GR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FP3 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GR will result in greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older FP3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FP3 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | Ricoh GR |
Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 300s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.90 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $182 | $971 |