Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the FP3 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FP3 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FP3 was launched 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the FP3 grades against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FP3 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| FP3 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FP3
| DP2 Quattro | FP3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | January 2010 | More recent by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| FP3 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FP3 comes with external measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the FP3 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FP3 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FP3 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FP3 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older FP3 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Sigma |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine IV | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.90 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $182 | $931 |