Clicky

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Panasonic FP3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Below is a in-depth comparison of the Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the FP3 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FP3 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The FP3 was launched 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FP3 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the FP3 grades against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FP3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FP3 DP2 Quattro 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FP3

 DP2 Quattro FP3 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2010More recent by 49 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FP3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FP3 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FP3 comes with external measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Take a look at the Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the FP3 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FP3 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the FP3 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FP3 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older FP3 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FP3 Portrait photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography advice
28
MP count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
77
focusing manually
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Panasonic FP3 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FP3 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
34
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Panasonic FP3
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
60
boasts focus by touch
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
53
decent MP (20MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FP3 Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
37
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse recording
59
focusing manually
nice screen size (3")
decent MP (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FP3 Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
27
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Panasonic FP3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FP3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Panasonic Sigma
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP3 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2010-01-06 2014-02-13
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Venus Engine IV TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-140mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.90 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lbs) 395 grams (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $182 $931