Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP7/Panasonic-FP7-front.jpg)
![Samsung ST95 front Samsung ST95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST95/Samsung-ST95-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 147g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FP7 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The FP7 was revealed at a similar time to the ST95 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FP7 matches up versus the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FP7 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP7 over the Samsung ST95
FP7 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Panasonic FP7
ST95 | FP7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP7 and Samsung ST95
FP7 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Panasonic FP7 has physical measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the FP7 and the ST95.
![Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP7-vs-Samsung-ST95-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FP7 and ST95 is 95 and 99 respectively.
![Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP7-vs-Samsung-ST95-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FP7 and ST95.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of files although you will want to take the age of the products into consideration.
![Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP7-vs-Samsung-ST95-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FP7-vs-Samsung-ST95-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP7 | Samsung ST95 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Touch Screen LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.90 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 147g (0.32 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $227 | $145 |