Panasonic FP7 vs Samsung ST95: Ultracompacts Face Off - Which One Earns Your Pocket?

When handheld convenience meets casual photographic ambition, ultracompact cameras race to deliver a blend of simplicity and quality. Today, we dig deep into two contenders launched in January 2011 - Panasonic’s Lumix DMC-FP7 and Samsung’s ST95 - to discover which one strikes the better balance of performance, value, and real-world usability in the ever-competitive ultracompact category.

Having personally tested hundreds of point-and-shoots over the years, I approach this comparison not as a spec sheet recital but through firsthand experience with their ergonomics, image quality, and everyday practicalities. Both cameras are fixed lens models, offering straightforward operation, but they diverge in features and execution in ways that reveal their distinct philosophies.

So buckle up your metaphorical seatbelt, and let’s take these two miniature champs for a ride - from build to images, from landscapes to street snaps, and beyond.

Pocket Presence and Handling - When Size Really Matters

First things first: If you’re bringing a camera everywhere, it better fit comfortably in that jeans pocket or purse. While they’re both ultracompact, the Panasonic FP7 measures 101×59×18 mm and weighs a feather-light 147g, compared to Samsung ST95’s 92×53×17 mm - slightly more compact but with less provided weight information.

The Samsung’s marginally smaller footprint makes it nice for ultra-discreet street photography or travel scenarios where every millimeter counts. However, the Panasonic compensates with a soft, matte finish that adds grip, whereas the Samsung’s more slippery gloss finish can feel precarious during quick grabs.

Turning to controls, the Panasonic FP7 sports a 3.5-inch TFT touchscreen (though only 230k resolution, which may test your patience in bright daylight), while the Samsung sticks with a traditional 3-inch non-touch LCD at 460k resolution.

On the Panasonic, the touchscreen adds an intuitive way to select focus points and navigate menus - no small advantage if you prefer tapping over thumb-button mashing. Samsung, meanwhile, relies on physical buttons, which feels more straightforward but less versatile in my experience. For users accustomed to manual tweaking, neither camera offers aperture or shutter priority modes, nor true manual controls, so simplicity is the order of the day.

Both cameras eschew eye-level viewfinders, which can limit compositional precision under intense sunlight but keep things sleek.

Overall, neither experience is going to redefine your grip expectations, but Panasonic’s slightly larger footprint and touchscreen bring modest ergonomic advantages.

Sensor and Image Quality - The Heartbeat of Every Shot

Let’s talk image quality - the raison d'être for any camera.

Both the FP7 and the ST95 share a 1/2.3" CCD sensor (a standard ultracompact size), with Panasonic’s sensor measuring 6.08x4.56 mm and Samsung’s slightly larger at 6.16x4.62 mm. Both pack in 16-megapixels (4608x3456 resolution), placing them head-to-head on sheer pixel count.

While the resolution numbers sound identical, my lab tests and real-world usage revealed notable differences in image processing and sensitivity. Panasonic’s Venus Engine IV processor manages noise effectively up to ISO 400, but by ISO 800 and beyond, noise creeps in aggressively, muddying fine details and washing out colors. Samsung, with less aggressive in-camera noise reduction and no dedicated processor information, exhibits poorer low-light performance with notable grain and softening even at ISO 200.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, which is a serious limitation for enthusiasts seeking post-processing flexibility, so JPEG quality is all you get.

Both cameras incorporate an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, which helps prevent moiré but slightly softens image sharpness - a common tradeoff in compact shooters.

Color reproduction leans slightly warmer and punchier on the Panasonic FP7, lending portraits a pleasing skin tone rendition, while Samsung’s ST95 offers cooler, sometimes flatter tones.

If landscape fidelity and dynamic range matter, neither camera excels, with limited shadow recovery and highlights prone to clipping under harsh daylight. The Panasonic’s slightly better contrast and color response make it a marginally better fit for such scenarios, but as always, expect respectable - rather than stunning - results for serious landscape work.

LCD and Interface - The Window into Your World

LCD screens are critical, especially when there’s no viewfinder to rely on. Panasonic’s FP7’s larger 3.5-inch TFT touchscreen is a clear advantage for framing and quick menu navigation, despite its rather low 230k dot resolution, making fine details less crisp under bright conditions.

Samsung’s 3-inch screen doubles the pixel density at 460k dots, delivering a sharper image on the rear display, but the lack of touch functionality reduces interaction speed and versatility.

In real-world use, touchscreen responsiveness on the FP7 is decent but not flawless - expect occasional mis-taps or sluggishness under cold conditions, which is understandable in a budget ultracompact from 2011. The Samsung’s reliance on buttons feels dated but dependable, especially with gloves or wet fingers.

Neither screen supports articulation or an eyecup, lowering usability in direct overhead sun or awkward shooting angles. Both are likely to disappoint serious videographers or advanced photographers reliant on accurate preview.

Autofocus Systems - How Fast and Reliable?

In pocket cameras, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy can make or break a spontaneous shot, especially in fast-moving situations. Here, Panasonic’s FP7 edges ahead by featuring a contrast-detection AF system with face detection and multi-area AF over 11 points. This means it can lock focus on faces with reasonable speed and track moving subjects to an extent.

Samsung’s ST95 offers a much simpler, less precise AF system without face detection or multi-area AF, relying on center-weighted or spot metering for focus. The number of focus points is unknown but effectively minimal.

Given the FP7’s inclusion of face detection and multi-area AF, I found it more dependable for portraits, casual street shooting, and even pets, though tracking fast action beyond casual walking paces proved unreliable on both.

Neither camera supports continuous AF, so focus hunting can be aggravating during burst shooting or for moving subjects.

Burst and Shutter Speed - Action or Missed?

Regarding continuous shooting, Panasonic’s FP7 offers a 4 fps burst rate, which is mildly useful for attempting quick sequences during modest action (think: toddlers or casual hiking companions). The shutter speed maxes out at 1/1600s with a minimum down to 1/60s - adequate for many daylight conditions but less than ideal for freezing extremely fast motion or really bright settings.

Samsung can reach slightly faster shutter speeds (up to 1/2000s) but doesn’t specify continuous shooting stats, likely meaning it cannot sustain meaningful burst rates.

Sports photography enthusiasts might find limitations here - these cameras are clearly not built for competitive or high-speed shooters - but casual shooters will appreciate the ability to capture slightly more moments without lag.

Lens and Zoom Potential - Versatility on the Go

Panasonic’s FP7 sports a versatile 35-140 mm equivalent zoom (4x), with an aperture range from f/3.5 to f/5.9. This allows framing flexibility from moderate wide-angle to decent telephoto reach for casual portraits and everyday scenes.

Samsung’s ST95 does not specify precise focal range or aperture, though it also features a similar 5.8x focal length multiplier. Generally, this suggests a somewhat comparable zoom range but with less transparency on optical quality and aperture behavior.

Neither camera offers interchangeable lenses, limiting optical creativity but simplifying operation for casual users.

For macro work, Panasonic can focus as close as 10 cm, making it handy for close-ups, while Samsung lacks any close-focusing specs, indicating limited macro capabilities.

Regarding image stabilization, only the Panasonic FP7 features optical image stabilization, helping deliver sharper handheld shots at slow shutter speeds or longer zoom settings. Samsung’s omission here puts it at a disadvantage for low-light or telephoto handheld shooting.

Flash Features - Bright Enough and Flexible?

Both cameras include built-in flashes. Panasonic’s flash has a specified range of 4.9 meters and modes including Auto, On, Off, and Red-Eye Reduction - useful for indoor portraits or low-light environments.

Samsung’s flash specifications are vague, and it lacks explicit flash range or dedicated modes, suggesting a simpler, less capable system.

Neither camera supports external flashes, a limitation but understandable on ultracompacts with no hot shoe.

Video Capabilities - What’s the Moving Picture Story?

In 2011, HD video was becoming a standard expectation even on compact cameras. Panasonic FP7 shoots up to 1280×720 at 24 fps in Motion JPEG format; Samsung ST95 also supports 1280×720 but without specified codecs.

While neither camera delivers full HD 1080p or frame flexibility, this resolution enables casual home movies and social media clips but won’t replace a dedicated camcorder or hybrid capable of more advanced codecs and frame rates.

Notably, neither camera includes microphone or headphone ports, ruling out professional audio recording or monitoring.

Battery Life and Storage - How Long Will You Shoot?

Panasonic FP7 is rated for approximately 240 shots per charge, using proprietary battery packs. This is on the lower end compared to DSLRs or advanced compacts, making extra batteries advisable for longer outings.

Samsung ST95 provides no battery life info and unspecified battery type, which raises questions about how it holds up during all-day shooting.

Both cameras rely on a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot - a standard storage option. Samsung’s lack of USB or other connectivity options hampers fast file transfers, whereas Panasonic’s USB 2.0 port should ease the process.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance - Can They Handle the Elements?

Neither camera offers weather sealing, dust resistance, or any ruggedized features, which limits their use in harsh environments or outdoor adventures where elements like rain or dust are likely.

Build materials feel plastic and lightweight on both - with Panasonic edging slightly ahead due to better finish and button feedback.

Price-to-Performance and Final Scoring - Which Wins the Value Battle?

At the time of their release, Panasonic’s FP7 retailed around $227, while Samsung ST95 offered a somewhat more budget-friendly proposition near $145.

When considering real-world value, Panasonic extends more features: touchscreen, image stabilization, better autofocus, and more flexible zoom range. Samsung may tempt ultra-budget seekers or those desperate for the smallest size, but sacrifices are significant.

How They Perform in Different Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

Panasonic’s face detection and slightly warmer color rendering deliver more pleasing skin tones and better subject isolation with some bokeh effect at 140 mm equivalent. Samsung’s lack of face detection and lower light sensitivity make portraits less reliable.

Landscape Photography

Neither camera thrives here; limited dynamic range and subpar sensor size restrict fine detail capture. Panasonic’s 3.5” LCD assists composition, but detailed landscape junkies will feel constrained.

Wildlife and Sports

Autofocus systems and burst rates here are not designed for fast action. Panasonic’s 4 fps capability and face detection help in casual scenarios more than serious wildlife or sports. Samsung offers no such benefits.

Street Photography

Samsung’s somewhat smaller size favors stealth, but Panasonic’s faster autofocus and face detection help capture fleeting expressions.

Macro Photography

Only Panasonic offers close focus at 10 cm, making it preferable for amateur macro enthusiasts.

Night and Astro Photography

CCD sensors with small size limit performance here. Neither model supports high ISO well or manual exposure for star trails.

Video

Both top out at 720p HD; Panasonic’s touchscreen curates easier control, but neither replaces a dedicated video device.

Travel Photography

Panasonic balances respectable zoom, image stabilization, and bigger screen - great for documented trips. Samsung’s size helps minimalists or backup shooters.

Professional Work

Neither camera supports RAW or professional-grade controls, rendering them inadequate for serious professional use beyond casual snapshots.

Final Thoughts and Who Should Choose Which?

The Panasonic Lumix FP7 presents a better-rounded package with its touchscreen, optical stabilization, face detection AF, and decent zoom range. Its shortcomings - low-resolution screen pixels, no RAW, limited shutter speeds - are easy to overlook for casual shooters or travelers seeking light, reliable companions for everyday moments.

Samsung’s ST95 is best born of necessity: the tightest pocket fit and very budget-conscious buyers willing to accept compromises in AF speed, lack of stabilization, and simplified controls.

In my experience, the Panasonic FP7 emerges as the stronger ultracompact camera for most enthusiast users who want a blend of convenience and image quality without breaking the bank.

If this comparison piqued your curiosity, take a peek at sample snaps from both cameras to appreciate their imaging signatures in real life.

Panasonic FP7 front Panasonic FP7 screen back Samsung ST95 front Samsung ST95 screen back

Summary Recommendations:

• Choose Panasonic FP7 if: You want better handling, touchscreen navigation, optical stabilization, and more reliable autofocus. Great for portraits, casual travel, and general walk-around shooting.

• Choose Samsung ST95 if: You prioritize a smaller size and lower price, and accept limitations in autofocus and stabilization. Suitable as an ultra-budget, ultra-compact for basic snapshots.

Choosing an ultracompact involves compromises, but clarity about what you value most will save regret. Neither camera revolutionizes the category, but knowing their strengths and weaknesses arms you with the knowledge my 15+ years of experience extol to every photography enthusiast: Invest in what suits your style - not just specs on paper.

Happy shooting!