Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 151g - 96 x 60 x 20mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Panasonic FP8 versus Sigma Quattro H, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Panasonic and Sigma. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the FP8 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the FP8 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FP8 was introduced 7 years earlier than the Quattro H and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FP8 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the FP8 scores vs the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FP8 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP8 over the Sigma Quattro H
| FP8 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Panasonic FP8
| Quattro H | FP8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 80 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FP8 and Sigma Quattro H
| FP8 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FP8 offers exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FP8 versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the FP8 vs the Quattro H.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the FP8 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.
Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The graphic here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the FP8 and Quattro H.
All in all, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The FP8 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will show greater detail using its extra 33 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older FP8 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic FP8 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Sigma |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-07-27 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine V | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-128mm (4.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $300 | $1,134 |