Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Panasonic FS12 versus Panasonic ZR3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Panasonic. The resolution of the FS12 (12MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FS12 was manufactured 9 months before the ZR3 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the FS12 matches up vs the ZR3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic FS12 Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Panasonic ZR3
FS12 | ZR3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Panasonic FS12
ZR3 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | April 2009 | Fresher by 9 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FS12 and Panasonic ZR3
FS12 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS12 offers external dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR3 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FS12 versus Panasonic ZR3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the FS12 versus the ZR3.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FS12 and ZR3 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The photograph below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FS12 and ZR3.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZR3 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older FS12 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FS12 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-04-17 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 31-124mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 129g (0.28 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $228 | $280 |