Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FS12 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively similar but the FS12 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizes.

The FS12 was released 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FS12 scores versus the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FS12 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
FS12 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Panasonic FS12
GR Digital IV | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
FS12 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FS12 has outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the FS12 versus the GR Digital IV.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS12 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FS12 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FS12 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Panasonic FS12 will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older FS12 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-04-17 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-124mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $228 | $599 |