Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the FS12 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FS12 was introduced 5 years before the WG-4 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the FS12 matches up vs the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FS12 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Ricoh WG-4
FS12 | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Panasonic FS12
WG-4 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | April 2009 | More modern by 58 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh WG-4
FS12 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic FS12 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FS12 and Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the FS12 compared to the WG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS12 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FS12 and WG-4.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged FS12 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FS12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-04-17 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-124mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 129g (0.28 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $228 | $330 |