Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cfa/61cfa7078e9ac6225a553418caffb93a2136e3af" alt="Samsung Galaxy NX front Samsung Galaxy NX front"
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Introduced June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the FS25 (12MP) and Galaxy NX (20MP) and the FS25 (1/2.3") and Galaxy NX (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The FS25 was revealed 5 years before the Galaxy NX and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy NX being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the FS25 scores vs the Galaxy NX when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 & Samsung Galaxy NX. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FS25 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Samsung Galaxy NX
FS25 | Galaxy NX |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Panasonic FS25
Galaxy NX | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 53 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FS25 and Samsung Galaxy NX
FS25 | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FS25 offers exterior measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy NX has specifications of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") having a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the FS25 against the Galaxy NX.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c007/4c007c1a8edee8383edbcc64ffd10da2c9abdcc3" alt="Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FS25 and Galaxy NX is 95 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5431/e5431b07c80c826133a3b322c6f0359de8b54f4b" alt="Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FS25 and Galaxy NX.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FS25 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung Galaxy NX will give you greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older FS25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d93af/d93af1b3a2a54e8f15e8cc7d27ccd91cb2389a39" alt="Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35577/355774e52d435ab45c1716771540548e493fee00" alt="Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Panasonic FS25 vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-01-27 | 2013-06-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 29-145mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.30 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 148g (0.33 lb) | 495g (1.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $230 | $1,300 |