Clicky

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
24
Overall
30
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Panasonic FS25
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

In this write-up, we are evaluating the Panasonic FS25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the FS25 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FS25 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The FS25 was revealed 6 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the FS25 scores vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FS25 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Panasonic FS25

 DP2 Quattro FS25 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2009More modern by 61 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FS25 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FS25 offers outer measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Panasonic FS25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FS25 and the DP2 Quattro.

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the FS25 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FS25 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FS25 having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FS25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Panasonic FS25
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
26
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Panasonic FS25 Street photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography info
56
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS25 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
25
image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Panasonic FS25
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
51
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FS25 Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
32
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse recording
59
focusing manually
nice screen size (3")
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FS25 Vlogging details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging details
28
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
wide angle not the best (29mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone port
9
lack of video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Panasonic FS25 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS25 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Sigma
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-01-27 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Highest boosted ISO 6400 -
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 29-145mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 5cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.30 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 148 gr (0.33 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $230 $931