Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- New Model is Sony A99
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Panasonic FS25 versus Sony A900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the FS25 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the FS25 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FS25 was brought out 4 months after the A900 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FS25 scores versus the A900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic FS25 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Sony A900
FS25 | A900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Panasonic FS25
A900 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS25 and Sony A900
FS25 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | October 2008 | Same generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Panasonic FS25 enjoys outer measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Check the Panasonic FS25 versus Sony A900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FS25 against the A900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FS25 and A900 is 95 and 54 respectively.
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FS25 and A900.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The FS25 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A900 will provide more detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively.
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FS25 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-27 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 29-145mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 148g (0.33 pounds) | 895g (1.97 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Pricing at release | $230 | $2,736 |