Clicky

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Introduced April 2009
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The FS42 was brought out 3 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the FS42 scores vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 FS42 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Panasonic FS42

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 FS42 
RevealedFebruary 2012April 2009More recent by 34 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 FS42 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS42 features external dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Contrast the Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the FS42 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FS42 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 95 and 69 respectively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to see the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FS42 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FS42 because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will render greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older FS42 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Panasonic FS42
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
73
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
low max ISO (1,000)
55
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than average in class (550g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography factors
16
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect AF
48
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography information
51
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
58
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
more heavy than average in class (550g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography highlights
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
62
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
22
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
comes with face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (550 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Ricoh
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-04-17 2012-02-02
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" APS-C
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 1000 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 33-132mm (4.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.30 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 550 gr (1.21 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $580 $871