Clicky

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released April 2009
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Additionally Known as WB1000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FS42 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the FS42 (1/2.5") and TL320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The FS42 was unveiled 2 months later than the TL320 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the FS42 grades versus the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Samsung TL320

 FS42 TL320 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Panasonic FS42

 TL320 FS42 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung TL320

 FS42 TL320 
LaunchedApril 2009February 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS42 offers exterior measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has proportions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FS42 compared to the TL320.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FS42 and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FS42 and TL320.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The FS42 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Samsung TL320 will provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography information
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography information
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
34
you can focus manually
has face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Street photography advice
Samsung TL320 Street photography advice
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
max ISO too low (1,000)
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Sports photography details
Samsung TL320 Sports photography details
16
max frames per second very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
30
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Panasonic FS42
Travel photography with Samsung TL320
51
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
59
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Panasonic FS42
Landscape photography with Samsung TL320
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
43
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
Vlogging with Samsung TL320
22
wide angle not great (33mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
31
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS42 and Samsung TL320
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42Samsung TL320
General Information
Company Panasonic Samsung
Model type Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 Samsung TL320
Also Known as - WB1000
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-04-17 2009-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Highest boosted ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-132mm (4.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.30 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 grams (0.29 pounds) -
Dimensions 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $580 $380