Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9028/d9028d70036c75208e2ca0723d37eec97b86f402" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front"
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Panasonic FS42 and Sony H300, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and H300 (20MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and H300 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The FS42 was unveiled 5 years prior to the H300 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the FS42 scores vs the H300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FS42 Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Sony H300
FS42 | H300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Panasonic FS42
H300 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 58 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Sony H300
FS42 | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FS42 provides physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sony H300 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FS42 and Sony H300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the FS42 against the H300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5445/b5445d2b0672b799715c9519e3fda6cf89a37a8d" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and H300 is 95 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea1d/cea1d69335780dde67f8f132935c08d7db0d8ff2" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the FS42 and H300.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The FS42 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony H300 will offer extra detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older FS42 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cf9d/7cf9d892973d5512a985fb457db3bf2da605ea82" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eef84/eef8482954eed8fb36918406b9cc4d4b7727f9f6" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony H300 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-04-17 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 590 grams (1.30 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $580 | $249 |