Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a60/49a601b81dc9ac950ac3b4b1df8dd7ab514aa7ad" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front"
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Superseded the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The FS42 was released 4 years before the HX300 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FS42 scores versus the HX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are provided at Panasonic FS42 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Sony HX300
FS42 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Panasonic FS42
HX300 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 46 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Sony HX300
FS42 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS42 has got physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
See the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the FS42 versus the HX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a162/9a1624951b639d05f6ef0e709149ccc66f774d09" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and HX300 is 95 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/506be/506be18455fd042bca2e436b7bee3de842876e1e" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FS42 and HX300.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FS42 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony HX300 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older FS42 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e64/08e64bb592b0c1609caf76698746710a3d1946f6" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison"
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac357/ac3576e5792addb640da5c5b2304506812d60ae6" alt="Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-04-17 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.30 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $580 | $339 |