Clicky

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Expand to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Announced April 2009
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Superseded the Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
Photography Glossary

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Panasonic and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The FS42 was released 4 years before the HX300 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the FS42 scores versus the HX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Sony HX300

 FS42 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Panasonic FS42

 HX300 FS42 
AnnouncedFebruary 2013April 2009More recent by 46 months
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Sony HX300

 FS42 HX300 
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FS42 has got physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

See the Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the FS42 versus the HX300.

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and HX300 is 95 and 63 respectively.

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FS42 and HX300.

As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The FS42 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony HX300 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older FS42 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic FS42 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
42
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Street photography info
Sony HX300 Street photography info
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,000)
50
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than others in class (623g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Sports photography advice
Sony HX300 Sports photography advice
16
max frames per second very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
has tracking focus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Panasonic FS42 Travel photography factors
Sony HX300 Travel photography factors
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
54
decent megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (623g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Panasonic FS42
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
48
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
Vlogging with Sony HX300
22
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
25
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic port
heavier than others in class (623 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Panasonic FS42 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FS42 and Sony HX300
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Panasonic Sony
Model type Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-04-17 2013-02-20
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1000 12800
Highest enhanced ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-132mm (4.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.30 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lb) 623 gr (1.37 lb)
Dimensions 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $580 $339