Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX40
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FX48 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FX48 was released 16 months earlier than the CX3 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the FX48 grades against the CX3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 and Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FX48 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Ricoh CX3
FX48 | CX3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic FX48
CX3 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 16 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX48 and Ricoh CX3
FX48 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX48 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the FX48 vs the CX3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FX48 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FX48 and CX3.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic FX48 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged FX48 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FX48 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | Ricoh CX3 |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FX40 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-01-27 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $325 | $329 |