Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX40
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Panasonic FX48 versus Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FX48 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the FX48 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FX48 was announced 17 months before the TL500 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the FX48 matches up vs the TL500 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 & Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX48 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Samsung TL500
| FX48 | TL500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Panasonic FX48
| TL500 | FX48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Panasonic FX48 and Samsung TL500
| FX48 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX48 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FX48 versus Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the FX48 against the TL500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX48 and TL500 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FX48 and TL500.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FX48 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic FX48 will give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged FX48 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Panasonic FX48 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FX40 | EX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-27 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $325 | $527 |