Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX550
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Panasonic FX580 and Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the FX580 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FX580 was unveiled 12 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FX580 grades against the WG-70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FX580 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Ricoh WG-70
| FX580 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Panasonic FX580
| WG-70 | FX580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | January 2009 | Fresher by 134 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FX580 and Ricoh WG-70
| FX580 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX580 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX580 and Ricoh WG-70 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the FX580 compared to the WG-70.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX580 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the FX580 and WG-70.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The older FX580 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FX580 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FX550 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-27 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167g (0.37 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $499 | $280 |