Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1
94 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Let's look closer at the Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FX700 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FX700 was launched 5 years before the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FX700 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX700 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| FX700 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Panasonic FX700
| WG-M1 | FX700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | July 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Common features in the Panasonic FX700 and Ricoh WG-M1
| FX700 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX700 has outside dimensions of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the FX700 against the WG-M1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX700 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FX700 and WG-M1.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you will want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The older FX700 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic FX700 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine FHD | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | AVCHD | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $399 | $2,000 |