Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
Portability
54
Imaging
62
Features
93
Overall
74

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Introduced January 2019
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-M1X (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-330 was manufactured 14 years earlier than the E-M1X and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-330 grades versus the E-M1X when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-M1X

 E-330 E-M1X 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus E-330

 E-M1X E-330 
IntroducedJanuary 2019March 2006More recent by 156 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k215kSharper screen (+822k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M1X

 E-330 E-M1X 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 has external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1X has dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 vs the E-M1X.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and E-M1X is 65 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and E-M1X.

As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus E-M1X to give you greater detail due to its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-330
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1X
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (7 megapixels)
77
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Olympus E-M1X
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition (616 grams)
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
67
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
environment proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than competition (997 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography features
Olympus E-M1X Sports photography features
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery life (870 CIPA)
supports phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1X
50
lighter than competition (616 grams)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (7 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
68
better than average battery life (870 shots)
environment proof
supports bluetooth
supports touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
more heavy than competition (997g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-330
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1X
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
does not have Timelapse function
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proof
better than average battery life (870 CIPA)
two card slots
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging features
Olympus E-M1X Vlogging features
9
no video
68
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone socket
more heavy than competition (997g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-M1X
 Olympus E-330Olympus OM-D E-M1X
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-330 Olympus OM-D E-M1X
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Type Advanced DSLR Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2006-03-18 2019-01-24
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 7MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Peak resolution 3136 x 2352 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 60.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 4096x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank)
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616 gr (1.36 pounds) 997 gr (2.20 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 870 photos
Battery type - Built-in
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Card slots Single Two
Launch price $1,100 $2,999