Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FX75 was brought out very close to the CX3 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the FX75 matches up versus the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh CX3
| FX75 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic FX75
| CX3 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh CX3
| FX75 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic FX75 has got exterior dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the FX75 versus the CX3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and CX3 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FX75 and CX3.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Panasonic FX75 to render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-01 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $139 | $329 |
