Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FX75 was announced 8 years earlier than the G900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the FX75 grades vs the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh G900
| FX75 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Panasonic FX75
| G900 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 94 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh G900
| FX75 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic FX75 comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the FX75 compared to the G900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the FX75 and G900.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh G900 to deliver greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged FX75 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh G900 |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-01 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $139 | $752 |