Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the FX75 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FX75 was brought out 11 months after the GR Digital III which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the FX75 matches up vs the GR Digital III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| FX75 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 11 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Panasonic FX75
| GR Digital III | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| FX75 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX75 offers outer dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FX75 against the GR Digital III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FX75 and GR Digital III is 94 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The image here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the FX75 and GR Digital III.
All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The FX75 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern FX75 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-01 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine HD II | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $139 | $399 |