Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Panasonic and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FX75 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WG-4 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the FX75 scores against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh WG-4
| FX75 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Panasonic FX75
| WG-4 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh WG-4
| FX75 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX75 features outer measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the FX75 compared to the WG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FX75 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the FX75 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FX75 will be behind in sensor tech.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-06-01 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $139 | $330 |