Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FX75 was brought out 10 years before the WG-70 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the FX75 grades vs the WG-70 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Ricoh WG-70
| FX75 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Panasonic FX75
| WG-70 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2020 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 117 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Ricoh WG-70
| FX75 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FX75 offers exterior measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the FX75 versus the WG-70.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The visual below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FX75 and WG-70.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older FX75 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Panasonic FX75 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-01 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $139 | $280 |
