Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. The resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FX75 was unveiled 19 months prior to the DV300F making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the FX75 matches up vs the DV300F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Samsung DV300F. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung DV300F
| FX75 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Panasonic FX75
| DV300F | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 19 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung DV300F
| FX75 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Panasonic FX75 comes with external measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FX75 vs the DV300F.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FX75 and DV300F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FX75 and DV300F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung DV300F to result in more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FX75 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung DV300F |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-06-01 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $139 | $200 |