Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FX75 was introduced 17 months after the SL102 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the FX75 matches up versus the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung SL102
| FX75 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Panasonic FX75
| SL102 | FX75 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung SL102
| FX75 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Panasonic FX75 provides physical measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the FX75 and the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FX75 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FX75 and SL102.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Panasonic FX75 to offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher FX75 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-01 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $139 | $130 |