Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FX75 was revealed 13 months earlier than the WB210 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the FX75 matches up versus the WB210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Samsung WB210. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung WB210
| FX75 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Panasonic FX75
| WB210 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 | June 2010 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung WB210
| FX75 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX75 comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the FX75 and the WB210.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The picture here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FX75 and WB210.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images although you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged FX75 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB210 |
| Other name | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-06-01 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $139 | $279 |