Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Samsung. The resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FX75 was unveiled 3 years before the WB30F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the FX75 scores against the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung WB30F
| FX75 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Panasonic FX75
| WB30F | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung WB30F
| FX75 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX75 provides external measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the FX75 and the WB30F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FX75 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FX75 and WB30F.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB30F to provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FX75 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB30F |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-06-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $139 | $180 |