Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Panasonic FX75 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FX75 was unveiled 3 years before the WB800F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the FX75 grades against the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung WB800F
| FX75 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Panasonic FX75
| WB800F | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung WB800F
| FX75 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FX75 has got external measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Panasonic FX75 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the FX75 vs the WB800F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FX75 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FX75 and WB800F.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older FX75 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $139 | $300 |
