Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Panasonic FX75 and Sony H200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Panasonic and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the FX75 (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FX75 was introduced 3 years prior to the H200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FX75 scores against the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Sony H200
| FX75 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Panasonic FX75
| H200 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Sony H200
| FX75 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FX75 provides outside dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Panasonic FX75 and Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the FX75 versus the H200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FX75 and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The image below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the FX75 and H200.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony H200 to offer you extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged FX75 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Panasonic FX75 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-01 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery format | - | AA |
| Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $139 | $250 |