Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Renewed by Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FZ200 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FZ200 was revealed 2 years later than the CX3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the FZ200 scores versus the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 and Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Panasonic FZ200 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Ricoh CX3
FZ200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Panasonic FZ200
CX3 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FZ200 and Ricoh CX3
FZ200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic FZ200 has outside dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the FZ200 and the CX3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FZ200 and CX3 is 65 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FZ200 and CX3.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Panasonic FZ200 to give you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The newer FZ200 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Ricoh CX3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-07-18 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine VII FHD | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 588g (1.30 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 37 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 114 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $499 | $329 |