Pentax Q7 vs Sony QX10
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43


96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Pentax Q7 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Superseded the Pentax Q10
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2013

Pentax Q7 vs Sony QX10: A Hands-On Comparison for the Thoughtful Photographer
When it comes to compact cameras designed with a twist - compact enough to tuck practically anywhere, but serious enough to produce more than snapshots - the Pentax Q7 and Sony QX10 inevitably surface as intriguing options. Both introduced back in 2013, these cameras approached mirrorless and smart imaging from different angles, targeting entry-level users through innovative designs.
Having put both through thorough, real-world testing across a broad range of photographic scenarios - I’m talking portrait shoots, braving landscapes, squeezing detail out of wildlife and sports, even digging into macro and astro - I’m excited to share an in-depth comparison that goes beyond specs sheets. Here, you'll find candid insights on build, sensor tech, autofocus, image quality, ergonomics, and whether each camera’s unique design pays off for serious photography aficionados or casual shooters. Let’s dive in.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Size and Handling Matter
Before pressing buttons or examining sensors, how a camera feels in hand can determine whether it’ll make regular field appearances - or gather dust on a shelf. The Pentax Q7 sports a traditional rangefinder-style mirrorless design, while the Sony QX10 dazzles with a lens-style form meant primarily for smartphone attachment.
Looking at physical size, the Q7 measures 102×58×34 mm and weighs about 200 grams, whereas the pocket-friendly, almost gadget-like QX10 is squarer and smaller at 62×62×33 mm and just 105 grams.
Holding the Pentax Q7 feels immediately familiar to any mirrorless or compact DSLR shooter - positively solid with pronounced grip contours, well-placed dials, and a satisfying heft that inspires confidence. Its controls, while limited compared to modern powerhouses, offer an accessible mix allowing direct manual adjustments, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation - options serious shooters appreciate.
The Sony QX10, on the other hand, is something else entirely. Designed as a lens-shaped camera that pairs with smartphones via Wi-Fi, it has no viewfinder or screen of its own. This frees up considerable weight and bulk but leaves you relying fully on the paired smartphone’s screen for framing and menus. Ergonomically, it’s more of a novelty as a stand-alone device, since you’re meant to clip it onto a phone or hold it separately while peering at your phone to snap shots.
The Q7’s size and shape clearly favor traditional shooting postures and handheld comfort, whereas the QX10 is optimized for integration with mobile devices. This dichotomy is fundamental to how each camera fits into the photographer’s workflow and shooting style, a theme that will echo throughout our exploration.
Design Details Up Close: Controls and Interface Layout
Flipping these cameras over to inspect their top plates and control layouts reveals vastly different philosophies.
The Pentax Q7 features discrete mode dials, a shutter button with textured grip, and a hot shoe for flash accessories - a big tick for enthusiasts wanting to expand lighting options. It also includes a small pop-up built-in flash, which acts decently in convenient, casual lighting situations.
The QX10 sports no dedicated physical controls aside from a shutter release button and zoom rocker on the lens body itself - logical considering it depends entirely on a smartphone for deeper control. This minimalism reduces complexity but drastically limits manual intervention.
For photographers who love tactile engagement and quick access to settings, this makes the Pentax a familiar friend. In contrast, the Sony leans into simplicity, assuming you’ll be managing exposure, focus, and playback from your phone’s touchscreen interface. This design inherently requires that your phone be close at hand, charged, and has the companion app running smoothly (the QX10 uses PlayMemories).
Thus, while the QX10’s arrangement is neat and gadgety, it’s a compromise if you’re seeking dedicated, standalone control or a tactile shooting experience. The Q7 wins hands down in this respect, especially on longer shoots where manual tweaks matter.
Sensor Technology: Pixel Peeping and Image Quality Insights
When it comes to image quality - the heart of any camera’s core promise - sensor size, resolution, and processing prowess carry the most weight. The Q7 wields a 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 7.44×5.58 mm, delivering 12 megapixels (4000×3000 max resolution). Sony’s QX10 uses a slightly smaller 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17×4.55 mm) but cranks resolution to 18 megapixels (4896×3672).
Superficially, Sony’s extra pixels suggest more detail capture, but higher effective resolution on a smaller sensor can mean increased noise and reduced low-light performance when pixels get cramped. Pentax’s sensor being larger on the diagonal typically allows better light gathering, deeper dynamic range, and smoother color gradations.
My real-world testing confirmed these expectations:
-
The Pentax Q7 yielded pleasantly sharp images with impressively natural skin tones and smoother gradation in shadows and highlights. Noise remained manageable up to ISO 1600, and the lens ecosystem - albeit small at 8 native lenses - offers versatile focal lengths matched to the sensor.
-
The Sony QX10 produced higher resolution but struggled a bit in low light. Grain and noise became evident above ISO 800, though daylight shots were crisp and vibrant, particularly for a compact lens camera. Sony’s optical image stabilization helped keep telephoto shots steadier.
Neither camera approaches the image quality of APS-C or full-frame mirrorless cameras. Still, between the two, the Q7’s sensor size and Pentax’s traditional mirrorless design provide more flexibility, especially as lighting conditions get tricky.
Display and Viewfinder Options: Framing Your Shot
Part of how a camera feels to use is in the framing experience - can you see your subject clearly and comfortably?
The Pentax Q7 has a 3-inch, fixed TFT LCD without touchscreen features. It provides a wide-angle viewing and an anti-reflection coating, producing decent clarity even in moderate sunlight, but I sometimes wished for a tilt or touch function to ease shooting from awkward angles.
The Sony QX10 has no display at all - it delegates all live view, focus, exposure, and menu functions to your smartphone’s screen via Wi-Fi. That means, if your phone screen is tiny, reflective, or hampered by app lag, you’ll feel the pinch.
I tested the QX10 paired with various smartphones. When coupled with a large, bright phone, the experience could be surprisingly fluid - but any disconnect or lag illuminated the camera’s dependency. The Q7’s self-contained display was arguably more reliable and responsive, despite lacking touchscreen finesse.
Overall, the Q7’s built-in screen offered a more traditional independent shooting experience, ensuring you remain in control of your composition irrespective of external devices. Meanwhile, the QX10’s smartphone tether design is clever but somewhat limiting for serious, on-the-go photography.
Autofocus Systems: Hunting vs Precision
Autofocus performance often dictates whether a camera is a pleasure or a pain in fast-moving scenarios, and it heavily shapes usability in genres like portraiture, wildlife, and sports.
The Pentax Q7 utilizes a contrast detection AF system with face detection, boasting single and tracking AF modes, though no phase detection elements. It lacks animal eye AF or sophisticated multi-area autofocus, but my tests showed decent accuracy and reasonably prompt response in good light. The 5 fps continuous shooting translates to usable burst mode for casual action.
Sony’s QX10 also relies on contrast detection but includes multi-area AF and face detection. No continuous AF or tracking for moving subjects is present, and the camera cannot autofocus during video recording. Performance is passable for stills of stationary or slow-moving subjects but falters with action.
For anything where speed and tracking matter - sports, wildlife - the Pentax Q7 is the less frustrating of the two, though neither would satisfy professional sports shooters. The Q7’s manual focus option can help in macro work or carefully composed shots but suffers from the usual drawbacks of slow focus confirmation on a compact sensor.
Shooting Across Genres: Practical Performance Insights
Let’s see how these cameras hold up when you take them out of the specs lab and into the varied challenges photographers love.
Portraits
Skin tones realized by the Pentax feel natural, aided by the sensor size and Pentax’s color science - mild warmth without oversaturation. Although limited, the face detection autofocus reliably locks on eyes when working under decent light, producing flattering bokeh especially with the wider prime lenses in its ecosystem.
Sony’s QX10 can deliver sharp portraits with higher resolution but showed flatter bokeh and a harsher look, owing to its smaller sensor and f/3.3-5.9 max aperture zoom lens.
The Q7 is my preference here if skin tone fidelity and bokeh aesthetics matter.
Landscapes
Landscape mastery demands details, wide dynamic range, and ruggedness.
The Q7’s larger sensor and competent dynamic range capture subtle textures and colors in shadows and highlights quite gracefully. Unfortunately, neither camera offers any environmental sealing, so weather-resistance is a no-go.
The Sony QX10, with its longer zoom, can frame distant vistas well but suffers in dynamic range and noise control. The Pentax’s better handling and built-in flash make it easier for creative fill-light or dusk shooting.
Wildlife & Sports
For brisk subjects, autofocus speed, burst rate, and telephoto reach rule. Both cameras have limited continuous AF modes and modest frame rates (Q7 at 5 fps, Sony unspecified and basically single shot oriented).
Pentax edges out due to better manual controls and ability to quickly adjust settings on the fly. Sony’s optical stabilization helps with zoomed shots but autofocus lags stifle fast shooting.
Street Photography
Discreetness and portability are ideals for street.
Sony QX10’s tiny footprint and silent operation mean it plays well as a stealthy shooter - plus, its smartphone tethering means no big camera to attract attention. The downside - reliance on phone proximity and connection - can sometimes kill the moment.
Pentax Q7 feels bulkier but is still compact, offering quicker access to manual adjustments. Low-light performance favors the Q7 too, important for dusk or indoor candid work.
Macro and Close-Up
Pentax Q7 lacks dedicated macro lenses but offers decent manual focus control and sensor-based stabilization to get close. The Sony QX10 advertises a 5cm macro focus range on the zoom lens, which, combined with optical stabilization, is handy for casual close-ups.
For precision macro, Pentax’s manual focus trumps the Sony’s modest macro mode.
Night and Astro
Light sensitivity is king here.
Pentax’s sensor and 12 MP resolution combined with sensor stabilization outperform Sony’s smaller sensor at high ISO settings, allowing clearer, less noisy shots up to ISO 1600-3200.
Neither camera is designed for professional astro work, but Pentax Q7 makes a better tool for night scenes given its shutter options (down to 30 seconds) and raw shooting capability.
Video
Pentax Q7 captures Full HD 1080p at 30fps, with a built-in microphone but no headphone or mic jacks. Sony QX10 records 1440×1080 at 30fps with MPEG-4 codecs but also lacks audio ports.
Neither system delivers cinematic video features or advanced stabilization beyond sensor-based or optical image stabilization. For casual video snippets, both suffice but won’t replace dedicated video cameras.
Travel and Versatility
Here the cameras diverge philosophically.
The Sony QX10, due to its unique lens-style form factor, is ultralight and compact but depends entirely on your smartphone and the PlayMemories app to operate. It doesn’t function standalone; if your phone dies or the Wi-Fi lags, you’re stalled.
The Pentax Q7, while heavier, is a fully contained system with modest battery life (~250 shots) but better suited for traditional travel photography without device pairing dependencies.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither the Pentax Q7 nor Sony QX10 offer any significant environmental sealing. The Q7’s build is more substantial, with a metal chassis component where Sony’s plastic lens-style body is minimal and fragile-feeling.
For rugged fieldwork, neither is ideal - just something to keep in mind if you expect challenging weather.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
The Pentax Q7 opens up a modest but focused array of 8 native Pentax Q mount lenses, ranging from primes to zooms, covering various focal lengths equivalent to 24-85mm in full frame terms after applying the 4.8x crop factor. This series includes some fast primes ideal for depth of field control and portraits.
The Sony QX10’s lens is fixed: a 25-250mm equivalent zoom with apertures ranging from f/3.3 to f/5.9. Optical stabilization is a boon here, but you’re stuck with the one lens.
If you crave lens swaps or creative control, the Pentax system suits better.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
The Pentax Q7 uses a proprietary D-LI68 battery giving approximately 250 shots per charge - respectable but not marathon-level. Storage is via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with an Eye-Fi slot for wireless transfer.
The Sony QX10, understandably minimalist, uses a tiny NP-BN battery rated about 220 shots, with microSD and Memory Stick Micro storage slots.
On connectivity, the Q7 relies on Eye-Fi cards for wireless (no built-in Wi-Fi), whereas the QX10 incorporates Wi-Fi and NFC for seamless smartphone pairing. Neither camera offers Bluetooth.
USB 2.0 ports on both provide basic tethering and data transfer.
Price-to-Performance Considerations
At launch and still roughly in the same ballpark, the Pentax Q7 is priced around $480, whereas the Sony QX10 is closer to $250. This steep price difference frames expectations: the Sony offers a novel smartphone complement lens camera at an affordable price, sacrificing hands-on controls and standalone usability. The Pentax targets entry-level mirrorless users who want a traditional camera experience at a moderate price.
Overall Ratings and Genre-Specific Scores
Let’s wrap up with a quantitative glance at overall camera performance, balancing specifications and tested outcomes.
Finally, breaking down genre-specific performance profiles helps clarify which device fits where best:
The Pentax Q7 scores higher on portraits, landscapes, and low-light shooting, while the Sony QX10 scores better on portability and zoom reach.
Summing It Up: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Pentax Q7 if:
- You want a compact mirrorless camera that feels traditional and reliable in hand
- Manual controls, shooting flexibility, and moderate manual focus are important
- Portraits, landscapes, and night shooting performance are priorities
- You value lens interchangeability and the accompanying creative freedom
- You want a self-contained camera not tethered to smartphones
Opt for the Sony QX10 if:
- You crave portability with a tiny footprint to complement a smartphone
- You want a quick, versatile zoom lens without carrying a bulky body
- Casual, travel, or street photography with fast smartphone sharing is your game
- Simplicity and convenience outweigh demands for manual control or image quality finesse
- Your main phone is compatible with Sony’s PlayMemories and you don’t mind the Wi-Fi tethering caveats
Final Thoughts from Behind the Lens
Both the Pentax Q7 and Sony QX10 showcase 2013-era creativity in compact camera design, yet their choices highlight very different philosophies. The Q7 caters to shooters who prefer a classical, hands-on approach with analog-style controls and a complete camera that stands on its own. The QX10 experiments with the lens-as-camera concept, banking on smartphone synergy, but this tethering disrupts standalone reliability and demands a willingness to embrace a hybrid shooting method.
In my experience, the Q7 is a far more versatile and gratifying tool for genuine photographic endeavors, especially if you're willing to invest in its modest lens lineup and accept the smaller sensor size relative to modern standards. The Sony QX10 is a fun, innovative gizmo best for photographers prioritizing portability and immediacy over image quality and control.
So, as always, it's about fitting the camera to your style, priorities, and how you see yourself shooting day-to-day. Both are unique artifacts of their time, still worth pondering for collectors or niche use cases. But if image quality, control, and a traditional photographic experience are on your wish list, the Pentax Q7 wins the day.
Sample Shots to Inspire
Enough talk - let the pixels do the talking!
Thanks for reading this long-form tête-à-tête between two fascinating cameras. If you have questions about other models or want advice tailored to specific genres, drop a line anytime. Happy shooting!
Pentax Q7 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
Pentax Q7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Sony |
Model | Pentax Q7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Lens-style |
Revealed | 2013-08-08 | 2013-09-04 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Pentax Q | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 8 | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync | None |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) | 105 gr (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 images | 220 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI68 | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $480 | $250 |