Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Panasonic FZ2500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Large Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Panasonic and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the FZ2500 (20MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the FZ2500 (1") and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FZ2500 was unveiled 4 years later than the WG-2 GPS and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the FZ2500 scores versus the WG-2 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
FZ2500 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 57 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Panasonic FZ2500
WG-2 GPS | FZ2500 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic FZ2500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
FZ2500 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FZ2500 comes with physical dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FZ2500 and Pentax WG-2 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FZ2500 compared to the WG-2 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FZ2500 and WG-2 GPS is 53 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FZ2500 and WG-2 GPS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FZ2500 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher FZ2500 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ2500 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 915 gr (2.02 pounds) | 198 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 70 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 538 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 260 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DMW-BLC12 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $998 | $300 |