Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Revealed July 2015
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Panasonic FZ300 and Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FZ300 (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FZ300 was released 4 years after the CX5 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the FZ300 grades against the CX5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 and Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic FZ300 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Ricoh CX5
| FZ300 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2015 | July 2011 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Panasonic FZ300
| CX5 | FZ300 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic FZ300 and Ricoh CX5
| FZ300 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic FZ300 comes with outside dimensions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FZ300 and Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the FZ300 vs the CX5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FZ300 and CX5 is 59 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the FZ300 and CX5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Panasonic FZ300 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The younger FZ300 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Panasonic FZ300 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-07-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 691 gr (1.52 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $598 | $399 |