Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Panasonic FZ35 versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the FZ35 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FZ35 was introduced 3 years before the H200 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the FZ35 scores versus the H200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Panasonic FZ35 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Sony H200
| FZ35 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Panasonic FZ35
| H200 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FZ35 and Sony H200
| FZ35 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FZ35 enjoys outside dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic FZ35 versus Sony H200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the FZ35 versus the H200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FZ35 and H200 is 72 and 67 respectively.
Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FZ35 and H200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony H200 to resolve more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged FZ35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Panasonic FZ35 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FZ38 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-486mm (18.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.4 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.50 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) | 530 gr (1.17 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Form of battery | - | AA |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $999 | $250 |