Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R
85 Imaging
46 Features
47 Overall
46
89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Introduced October 2009
- Refreshed by Panasonic GF2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-5N
- Later Model is Sony NEX-5T
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Panasonic GF1 versus Sony NEX-5R, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Panasonic and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the GF1 (12MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the GF1 (Four Thirds) and NEX-5R (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GF1 was announced 3 years earlier than the NEX-5R and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the GF1 grades against the NEX-5R in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic GF1 Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Sony NEX-5R
| GF1 | NEX-5R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Panasonic GF1
| NEX-5R | GF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 | October 2009 | More recent by 35 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic GF1 and Sony NEX-5R
| GF1 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic GF1 offers physical dimensions of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has proportions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Panasonic GF1 versus Sony NEX-5R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GF1 vs the NEX-5R.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GF1 and NEX-5R is 85 and 89 respectively.
Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GF1 and NEX-5R.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GF1 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-5R will show extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older GF1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Panasonic GF1 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-10-14 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine HD | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | AVCHD Lite | AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 385 grams (0.85 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | 513 | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $750 |