Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300M front Samsung NX300M front"
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Launched February 2011
- Succeeded the Panasonic GF1
- Newer Model is Panasonic GF3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the GF2 (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the GF2 (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GF2 was released 22 months prior to the NX300M which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GF2 scores vs the NX300M with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 and Samsung NX300M. The complete galleries are available at Panasonic GF2 Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Samsung NX300M
GF2 | NX300M |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Panasonic GF2
NX300M | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 22 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic GF2 and Samsung NX300M
GF2 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic GF2 enjoys outer measurements of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the GF2 versus the NX300M.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf7f/9cf7f81ef9d054a7953da551dc6a3d92166fb94c" alt="Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GF2 and NX300M is 88 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f55/e2f55ed9f05fcde37399d63765a4d458652fd9d1" alt="Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison"
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GF2 and NX300M.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GF2 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX300M will render more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older GF2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dc2f/0dc2fbb021e864510e2f6d45c70ecea911784205" alt="Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison"
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6de3e/6de3e07cdacf72e4e570c651ff378f13641dcb60" alt="Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Panasonic GF2 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | Samsung NX300M |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-02-24 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine FHD | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 310 grams (0.68 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 506 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $330 | $699 |