Clicky

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
50
Overall
48
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Panasonic GF2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Older Model is Panasonic GF1
  • Replacement is Panasonic GF3
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

In this article, we will be looking at the Panasonic GF2 versus Sigma Quattro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Panasonic and Sigma. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the GF2 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the GF2 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The GF2 was announced 6 years before the Quattro and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GF2 scores vs the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Sigma Quattro

 GF2 Quattro 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Panasonic GF2

 Quattro GF2 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016February 2011Fresher by 60 months
Screen resolution1620k460kClearer screen (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Panasonic GF2 and Sigma Quattro

 GF2 Quattro 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic GF2 features outside measurements of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Compare the Panasonic GF2 versus Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the GF2 vs the Quattro.

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GF2 and Quattro is 88 and 63 respectively.

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GF2 and Quattro.

Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GF2 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail with its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older GF2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Panasonic GF2 Portrait photography features
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography features
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
supports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
81
has manual focus
high megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Street Comparison

Panasonic GF2 Street photography features
Sigma Quattro Street photography features
65
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition (625g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Panasonic GF2
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery pack (300 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
70
high megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Panasonic GF2 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery pack (300 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
55
weather sealing
high megapixels (29MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (625g)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Panasonic GF2 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography highlights
55
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (300 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
72
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
high megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Panasonic GF2
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
32
touchscreen capability
has face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have microphone jack
22
has face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( pixels)
lack of external mic support
heavier than competition (625 grams)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Panasonic GF2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic GF2 and Sigma Quattro
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Panasonic Sigma
Model type Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Sigma sd Quattro
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-24 2016-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Venus Engine FHD Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 23 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Amount of lenses 107 76
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video format AVCHD, Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 310g (0.68 lbs) 625g (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 506 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $330 $738