Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Replaced the Panasonic GF7
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010

Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a complete review of the Panasonic GF8 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the GF8 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the GF8 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have different sensor measurements.

The GF8 was launched 6 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GF8 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic GF8 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GF8 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | March 2010 | Newer by 72 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Panasonic GF8
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | GF8 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic GF8 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
GF8 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Panasonic GF8 has got physical dimensions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Panasonic GF8 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the GF8 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GF8 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 90 and 85 respectively.

Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GF8 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GF8 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic GF8 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher GF8 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic GF8 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-02-15 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.8fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 266g (0.59 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | 410 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $549 | $349 |