Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D
81 Imaging
50 Features
57 Overall
52
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
- Announced July 2009
- Replacement is Panasonic GH2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Old Model is Pentax K100D S
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Panasonic GH1 and Pentax K200D, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Pentax. The resolution of the GH1 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is pretty close but the GH1 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GH1 was brought out 11 months after the K200D and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic GH1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GH1 grades versus the K200D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 & Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic GH1 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Pentax K200D
| GH1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | September 2008 | More modern by 11 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Panasonic GH1
| K200D | GH1 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic GH1 and Pentax K200D
| GH1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Panasonic GH1 has physical dimensions of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") having a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Contrast the Panasonic GH1 and Pentax K200D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GH1 against the K200D.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GH1 and K200D is 81 and 61 respectively.
Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GH1 and K200D.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GH1 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic GH1 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger GH1 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Panasonic GH1 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Pentax |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | Pentax K200D |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-10 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine HD | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 18.89 x 14.48mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 273.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.50 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | AVCHD | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 385 gr (0.85 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 64 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 772 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $949 | $600 |
