Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
66 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 550g - 133 x 93 x 82mm
- Released September 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic GH2
- Successor is Panasonic GH4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look more closely at the Panasonic GH3 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the GH3 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the GH3 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GH3 was brought out 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic GH3 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GH3 matches up versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic GH3 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH3 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GH3 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | November 2009 | More recent by 35 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Panasonic GH3
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic GH3 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GH3 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GH3 enjoys outside dimensions of 133mm x 93mm x 82mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.2") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic GH3 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the GH3 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GH3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 66 and 77 respectively.
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GH3 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GH3 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Panasonic GH3 will render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer GH3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic GH3 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine VII FHD | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | OLED Monitor with static touch control | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,744k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.67x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 93 x 82mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.2") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 812 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $566 |