Panasonic GH4 vs Pentax K-50

Here is a in-depth analysis of the Panasonic GH4 versus Pentax K-50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Panasonic and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the GH4 (16MP) and the K-50 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the GH4 (Four Thirds) and K-50 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The GH4 was unveiled 3 months later than the K-50 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic GH4 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GH4 scores vs the K-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 & Pentax K-50. The full galleries are available at Panasonic GH4 Gallery & Pentax K-50 Gallery.

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GH4 has got physical measurements of 133mm x 93mm x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") and a weight of 560 grams (1.23 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-50 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).

Look at the Panasonic GH4 versus Pentax K-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the GH4 vs the K-50.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GH4 and K-50 is 66 and 63 respectively.

Usually, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GH4 and K-50.

Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The GH4 uses the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging.