Panasonic GM1 vs Pentax K-50

Here is a thorough analysis of the Panasonic GM1 vs Pentax K-50, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Panasonic and Pentax. The image resolution of the GM1 (16MP) and the K-50 (16MP) is pretty close but the GM1 (Four Thirds) and K-50 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The GM1 was introduced very close to the K-50 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic GM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GM1 scores vs the K-50 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 & Pentax K-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic GM1 Gallery & Pentax K-50 Gallery.

In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Panasonic GM1 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 55mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-50 has measurements of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") having a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).

Analyze the Panasonic GM1 vs Pentax K-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the GM1 versus the K-50.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GM1 and K-50 is 93 and 63 respectively.

Usually, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GM1 and K-50.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The GM1 uses the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging.