Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Panasonic and Samsung. The image resolution of the LF1 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the LF1 (1/1.7") and SL202 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe LF1 was manufactured 4 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the LF1 grades vs the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic LF1 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Samsung SL202
| LF1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 59 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Panasonic LF1
| SL202 | LF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Panasonic LF1 and Samsung SL202
| LF1 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Panasonic LF1 comes with external measurements of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the LF1 vs the SL202.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the LF1 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the LF1 and SL202.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The LF1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic LF1 will show extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern LF1 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic LF1 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-11-26 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-200mm (7.1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 192 gr (0.42 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 211 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $500 | $140 |